|
Mohan
Srinivasarao Research Lab School
of Polymer, Textile and Fiber Engineering, School
of Chemistry & Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta GA 30332-0295 |
|
|
Microscopy |
(For Guidelines, see the bottom of the page)
|
Proposal
number and title |
Proposals
you must
review |
||
|
1 |
Rolfe Bradley Johnson |
2 3
4 5 |
|
|
2 |
Yanhui Yuan |
3 4
5 6 |
|
|
3 |
Aparna Boddapati |
4 5
6 7 |
|
|
4 |
The Effect of Implant Surface
Chemical Modification with Polyelectrolytes. |
Jung Hwa Park |
5 6
7 8 |
|
5 |
Ian D. Winters |
6 7
8 9 |
|
|
6 |
Investigation of adsorbed polyelectrolyte
density profile at a functionalize gold surface |
James Hardin |
7 8
9 10 |
|
7 |
Kyle Anderson |
8 9
10 11 |
|
|
8 |
Investigation
of the Tg of Mixed Polymer Brushes on Planar Substrates |
Marcus C. Johnson |
9 10 11
12 |
|
9 |
Michelle Schlea |
10 11
12 13 |
|
|
10 |
To Be
More or Less Plastic: Affecting Glass Transition by Nanotechnology |
Richard Harper |
11 12
13 14 |
|
11 |
Qiong Guo |
12 13
14 15 |
|
|
12 |
Yonggang Wang |
13 14
15 16 |
|
|
13 |
Kathryn Smith |
14 15
16 17 |
|
|
14 |
Rajalaxmi Dash |
15
16 17 18 |
|
|
15 |
Katie Campbell |
16
17 18
19 |
|
|
16 |
Enhanced
properties of carbon nanotube-liquid crystal nanocomposites |
Il Tae Kim |
17
18 19 20 |
|
17 |
Wei Lin |
18
19 20 21 |
|
|
18 |
Mixed Polymer Brushes for Efficient Organic Photovoltaic Cells |
Subodh Prakash Jagtap |
19
20 21 22 |
|
19 |
Liquid Crystal
Polymers for use in Anti-Ballistic Applications |
Tracy Talley |
20
21 22 23 |
|
20 |
Deborah Ortiz |
21
22 23 24 |
|
|
21 |
John Terracina |
22 23
24 1 |
|
|
22 |
Relaxation mechanisms of ultra high
molecular weight polyethylene |
Rodolfo Camacho‐Aguilera |
23 24
1 2 |
|
23 |
Study of Fundamental
Processing Mechanism of H-PDLC & its Application. |
MINSANG PARK |
24 1
2 3 |
|
24 |
Mixed
Brush Polymers and their Application as Stimuli-Responsive Materials |
Adriana San
Miguel |
1 2
3 4 |
Evaluation
of the Proposals
Please grade the proposals
based on the following:
First
and foremost - Is the proposal asking good question(s) - how well are the ideas
laid out?
(Examine
critically: The relevance of the proposal to Polymer Physics - this is just
as important as the ideas and the questions asked!!)
Does it provide adequate
introduction and motivate the studies?
Is
the proposal written in a logical fashion?
Does
it provide adequate details for how the experiments will be done and does it
provide the anticipated results?
Does
the proposal give you an idea that a good literature review was done? (In other
words, is there adequate motivation for the proposal?)
Please assign a
letter grade - provide an explanation of why you assigned the grade?